Scientific research and essays isi journal citation
Social media, in particular, has merged information with public opinion, and brought closer to reality, the concept of global unity. While there is much discussion on the application and influence of social media tools in primary and high school education, there is relatively less known about the use of social media in higher scientific research domains.
It is obvious that social media tools offer potential to serve as a powerful public voice for science, but is this potential being harnessed fully yet? While this perception was strong enough a few years back to cause failure of science-focused social networking sites such as Scientist Solutions, SciLinks, Epernicus, 2collab and Nature Network, the situation seems to have turned around considerably.
The past years have seen an increasing number of scientists step down from the ivory tower of traditional scientific communication to engage in both focused and nonfocused social media sites to both obtain and share information and knowledge in their fields.
The scientific population still remains divided in this Scientific research and essays archive, but the trend is shifting towards increasing use of social media platforms for science. The rest of respondents stated they would never use social media for academic or professional work.
It is reasonable to expect that the numbers have shifted towards greater use of social media in science since then. Little wonder then that ResearchGate already has more than 4. Nature Scientists and the social network Focused social media sites such as google scholar, ResearchGate and LinkedIn are largely used by scientists and engineers to connect with their peers for discussions, validation and communication.
The type of online conversations and shared content among scientists in social media vary widely between sharing journal articles to circulating information about professional opportunities and upcoming events and posting references.
With more and more digital natives slowly nearing the age of involvement in research, social media is set to transform and expand the culture of science as a whole. Blogs are becoming ideal media for extended scientific conversations and fast-paced discussions of cutting edge topics.
Blog entries are now slowly being considered for pre-print and post-print discussions of peer-reviewed manuscripts and additional information thereof. Stephen Hawking, for example, has a Twitter presence, and interacts with a large worldwide community to discuss both science and otherwise.
There has been, in recent years, a need for the scientific community to engage in science outreach via social media SOSM as part of a broader agenda for researchers to engage the public.
Thus, social media can be a virile vehicle of hype. Interestingly, in the case of the arsenic debacle, the refutation of the hype was also broadcast live on social media; microbiologist Rosie Redfield live-blogged her attempts to replicate the original study, thus disproving it long before formal peer reviewed communication.
Another serious barrier to adoption of social media tools in scientific communication is the absence of quantitative metrics to measure accuracy, impact and long term utility of the science being communicated. There are a few attempts at such developments; the altmetrics movement for example, has been developed to provide a means to measure the real-world impact of scientific research as opposed to the traditional metric of journal value.
Social media can, undoubtedly, be nucleating spots of misinformation and pseudoscience with potential to distort public understanding of scientific ideas. However, its ease of communication to both peers and public is critical to the distribution of scientific information and spread of scientific temper among people.
It may not be long before social media becomes the only powerful means of communication, and a scientist may not be doing science much of a favor by not being in it.The scientific literature is designed to be a reliable archive of scientific research, providing a growing, stable base for new research investigations.
When scientists present their new ideas and results to the community, they are expected to support their ideas with knowledge of the scientific literature and the work that has come before them.
On February 3, , the National Institutes of Health (NIH) issued a new policy on "Enhancing Public Access to NIH-Funded Research." It urges NIH-funded researchers to make all their peer-reviewed journal articles available for free to everyone through a central repository called "PubMed Central," within 12 months of publication in a journal.
Essays. Research Papers. Coursework. Thesis. Dissertations. Term Papers. Research methodology involves the collection and analysis of materials relevant to the study.
when you are doing a research paper on history a visit to an archive will provide you with unique material for analysis. decided to base your essay on observation. The cost of subscribing to all research journals needed has risen by percent above inflation since while academic library budgets have only risen by 79 percent total.
The ability to reproduce scientific research is a crucial test of its veracity. Although the meaning of the term ‘reproducibility’, and to a lesser extent that of ‘replicability’, is subject to debate, for the purposes of this paper we adopt the basic interpretation that reproducibility means being able to obtain the same results by repeating the same method.
Scientific research and essays (SCI RES ESSAYS) The experiment was conducted at Department of Seed Science and Technology, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Madurai during